No Actual Pussy In ‘Playboy’ Philippines
Filed under: 1 Philippines Babes, Playboy Philippines
“Spanx” showed me this interview with Playboy Philippines editor-in-chief and enthusiastic supporter of masturbation using only the sheer power of imagination (with the aid of not-really-nude Playboy models) Beting Laygo Dolor, where Beting assures people that the Philippines edition of the magazine will more or less suck.
And I quote:
…the traditionally racy magazine will not show frontal nudity, the editor-in-chief said Thursday.
“Maybe one nipple,” he said.
“There will be no full frontal nudity.”
“We are targeting a different demographic — the slightly mature, more upscale men,” Dolor said.
“The main reasons for them buying this magazine is for the artwork, articles and photography,” he said.
Well, this case is no different from Playboy Indonesia, and probably of other Playboy local editions in countries where people would rather fuck she-goats than human females.
I haven’t actually seen a copy of Playboy Philippines yet, but if you already have, why not share your opinion here and tell us why it might just be one magazine-load of bullshit. Or better, scan the mag and email the pics to Flesh Asia Daily so thousands of “curious” folks will see what’s in it for them before they shell out P199 (about $5).
And hey, I’m already wondering: if Playboy won’t do things as hot as this Sachie Sanders or Precious Adona number, I doubt its future in this country.
April 4th, 2008 at 3:43 pm
“’We are targeting a different demographic — the slightly mature, more upscale men,’ Dolor said.”
UTTER BULLS**T. Period. The only demographic you’ll be targeting with your unwillingness to stretch the moral fibre and push the boundaries of decency - something every soft core mag should aspire to do - are the prepubescent boys who jack off to the cleavage created by their chubby aunt’s
breasts as she bends over to kiss them. Wait… I got one more. …Are the Amish who would find the revealed ankle of a dried-up grandmother of 12 arousing.
Not for minors? Only minors would appreciate your so-called erotica. Once they explore their internet p0rn pipes they won’t need you anymore.
Whatever happened to print pornography being something tantalizing in its secrecy, something whose forbiddenness alone evokes excitement and ecstasy? You know what I’m talking about - The kind of mag you have to hide under your bed from your parents, the kind of mag whose features people have to whisper ear-to-ear.
Nowadays all we have is watered-down, excessively commercial, made-for-TV fare. I’d rather watch TV thanks, there’s more skin there if you channel surf hard enough. FHM, Maxim, now Playboy, you’ve all sold out to the politically correct. Your fear of controversy is not out of some pretentious moral obligation but out of ensuring your circulation numbers never dip.
F**K them. The internet is for p0rn.
April 4th, 2008 at 3:49 pm
“’We are targeting a different demographic — the slightly mature, more upscale men,’ Dolor said.”
UTTER BULLS**T. Period. The only demographic you’ll be targeting with your unwillingness to stretch the moral fibre and push the boundaries of decency - something every soft core mag should aspire to do - are the prepubescent boys who jack off to the cleavage created by their chubby aunt’s
breasts as she bends over to kiss them. Wait… I got one more. …Are the Amish who would find the revealed ankle of a dried-up grandmother of 12 arousing.
Not for minors? Only minors would appreciate your so-called erotica. Once they explore their internet p0rn pipes they won’t need you anymore.
Whatever happened to print pornography being something tantalizing in its secrecy, something whose forbiddenness alone evokes excitement and ecstasy? You know what I’m talking about - The kind of mag you have to hide under your bed from your parents, the kind of mag whose features people have to whisper ear-to-ear.
Nowadays all we have is watered-down, excessively commercial, made-for-TV fare. I’d rather watch TV thanks, there’s more skin there if you channel surf hard enough. FHM, Maxim, now Playboy, you’ve all sold out to the politically correct. Your fear of controversy is not out of some pretentious moral obligation but out of ensuring your circulation numbers never dip.
F**K them. The internet is for p0rn!!!!!!
8p
April 4th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
Sorry double post!
April 5th, 2008 at 3:36 pm
^^^ amen to that.
April 6th, 2008 at 1:35 am
this magazine is totally useless. i’d rather buy the much cheaper fhm than this conservative crap. this mag should be called “prayboy”, not playboy. go ahead and pray all day but you won’t see any pussy here. we don’t care about your demographic shit. we want to see naked beauty!
April 6th, 2008 at 2:20 pm
no beavers??? and you call it Playboy???
that Dolor dude will definitely target a different demographic when he starts kissing my ass. LIKE WHAT THE HELL WOULD I DO WITH ONE NIPPLE?!?!?!
dammit…
idiot…
sorry guys. i got carried away.
(happy thoughts… happy thoughts…)
April 7th, 2008 at 1:48 am
how about a boycott of this magazine? pag wala silang kinita, mapipilitan silang magpakita.
May 12th, 2008 at 2:22 pm
whadayamean boycott? just don’t buy!!! better yet they better stop publishing anymore useless shit like that!!! makakatulong pa sa environment!!! ligtas pa sisibakin na mga puno at kakainin na langis at kuryente sa paggawa ng magazine. playboy phils is simply a case too little too late. they should’ve done that during the tetchie agbayani era 30years ago.
August 30th, 2008 at 2:48 am
No pussy in Philippine playboy magazines?! That is so gay! What a pussy!